Torture: Brainwashing vs. Information, Politics vs. Protection

Did Bush/Cheney torture to get FALSE confessions rather than intelligence?

Since the torture techniques used were known by those who ordered them NOT to produce reliable intelligence, but WERE known to be useful for BRAINWASHING...., for breaking people... * (See below for some supporting evidence)

... THEN isn't the obvious conclusion that Bush/Cheney wanted people broken down so that they would TELL THEM EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANTED TO HEAR and BELIEVE IT?

Doesn't it make sense that they wanted the detainees to say: There was a link to Saddam that they were planing hundreds of attacks that had been foiled by Bush and Cheney and the Iraq invasion? Dirty bombs, bio weapons, etc.

Bush/Cheney had the courts all ready on the other end to accept coerced confessions.

Was the Bush/Cheney strategy to brainwash the detainees to be actors in a play that would "prove" the rational for the Iraq war, their changes to our Constitution, and consolidate their power?

Just a thought... does this make sense to anyone else?
Any direct evidence?

HELP: The Right is ruling the blogs on MSN sites. Please make sure there is some alternative view available for the readers!

Your comment can be one click away from 12 Million plus unique eyeballs a month!
Look for articles with 10 or less comments then you can be seen with the article forever!

http://cbsnews.com
http://abcnews.com
http://usatoday.com

It is typical to see 10 right wing posts in row all uncontested.

See Extended entry for a typical example on the stimulus bill.

"News Sites Love McCain...."
McCain has a 3 to 1 advantage on MSM sites: ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox!
* (See extended entry for reference)

HELP ACT, Please. YOU ARE NEEDED! Stop blogging to the converted. Obama is getting slandered with no rebuttals on USA Today! It seems like 10:1  ! So much so that folks are saying "where are the Obama supporters?".
http://www.usatoday.com/politics

Your comment can be one click away from 12 Million plus unique eyeballs a month!
Look for articles with 10 or less comments then you can be seen with the article forever!
McCain dominates on these sites too. It looks like no one supports Obama!
http://cbsnews.com
http://abcnews.com
Stop Blogging to the Converted!

Bloggers! Help!  
Fellow Dems, your thoughtful posts are needed by independent voters who get their information from the MSM! We are blogging to the converted!
The first 10 posts are often "Husien is a Hamass MUSLIM!" Let's get some facts out there!

ABC News, USA Today, CBS News: need a few good pro Obama, on message posts!

USAToday.com 23.1 million unique visitors a month
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/de fault.htm?refresh=1

ABCNews.com  10.6 million unique visitors each month in 2007
http://abcnews.go.com/politics

CBSNews.com 9.2 million unique visitors each month 2007
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/politics /main250.shtml

We are supposed to dominate the Web but I think we are all at MSNBC.com or here.

I worry sometimes we are blogging to the converted!

Let's make sure these 40 million people have an opportunity to get the facts on Barack Obama.

Thanks for your help....

Calling all writers!  ABC News, USA Today, CBS News: need a few good pro Obama, on message posts!
These are some sites that could use a couple of pro Obama, on message posts every night.
On some of these sites if you can be one of the first 10 you can be on the same page with the article forever, or just one click away when the user views the oldest posts first. Also remember to recommend other good pro Obama posts!

Many times I see articles and the first 10 or 20 posts are all anti Obama, many slanderous. It would be nice to balance those posts out.

USAToday.com 23.1 million unique visitors a month
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/de fault.htm?refresh=1

ABCNews.com  10.6 million unique visitors each month in 2007
http://abcnews.go.com/politics

CBSNews.com 9.2 million unique visitors each month 2007
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/politics /main250.shtml

We are supposed to dominate the Web but I think we are all at MSNBC.com or here.

I worry sometimes we are blogging to the converted!

Let's make sure these 40 million people have an opportunity to get the facts on Barack Obama.

Thanks
Graham Poor

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/070 8/11880_Page2.html
Great article rejecting the "Flip Flop" / "Race to the Center" smear on Obama
by the chief speechwriter and deputy policy director for Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign:

"Throughout the left-wing blogosphere, the cry has come: Barack Obama is moving away from them, and to the center. "Moving to the middle is for losers," cried the politically ambidextrous Arianna Huffington. He's "betraying his claims of being a new kind of politician," declared Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos.

But all this outrage ignores the obvious: Throughout his career, Obama has consistently framed himself as a post-partisan centrist. He's been a bridge-builder all his life, first between black and white, and now between left and right.

It's a formula for victory in a country that's essentially center-right. Even after all the alienation from the Bush administration, a new Washington Post/ABC poll affirms that only 19 percent of Americans describe themselves as liberal, while 43 percent say moderate and 35 percent, conservative.
...."

McCain's Ad "Love" shows hippies kissing and him in Vietnam. The theme being his love of country has always come before self love.

How does his divorce fit this claim of continual sacrifice and self service?

Today an article was published about his divorce with an interview with his x-wife, Carol.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl e-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously -left-behind.html

From an Obama supporter asking a favor of Hillary supporters:

If Obama wins the nomination, that victory is worth less than nothing without Clinton supporters' votes in the fall. Because Obama is not going to win with only half of the Democrats.

Having earned about 50% of the vote Hillary Clinton and her supporters should have an unprecedented say in the policy, priorities and staffing (including VP) of the potential Democratic administration.

Do Clinton supporters have any ideas to make it possible for them to vote for the Democratic nominee in November and give him a chance for the next 4 years?